Review, Recognition, Citations, and Invited Activity
Review and recognition evidence should come from verifiable third-party activity: judging, peer review, curriculum review, invited speaking, awards, external citations, partner endorsements, media mentions, or public adoption. Unsupported praise is excluded.
By the AI Education for Kids Editorial Team · Materially reviewed August 3, 2026
Evidence standard: This page organizes public-benefit work and verification artifacts. It does not state or imply that any immigration category has been approved or guaranteed. Independent records, dated source files, and third-party confirmation are stronger than self-published claims.
Acceptable evidence
List only what can be checked
Evidence type
Required proof
Public wording
Judging or review
Invitation, completion confirmation, program page, or certificate
State role, organizer, date, and scope
Citation or media
Public URL, archive, publication date, and context
Quote sparingly and link to source
Award or recognition
Award page, issuing organization, selection basis, and date
Avoid superlatives unless source uses them
Partner endorsement
Permissioned letter or public partner page
Separate use evidence from general praise
Language rules
Use factual wording such as “invited to judge,” “cited by,” “used by,” or “reviewed by.”
Do not use “renowned,” “leading,” “top,” or “world-class” unless an independent source says that exact idea.
Separate third-party evidence from self-published content and keep archive copies.
